180 of 2001 before the Tribunal. After notice when the matter was to be taken up for final hearing, instead of arguing the matter on merit challenging the appointment of this writ petitioner, the OA was sought to be withdrawn. The Tribunal, by order dated 14.01.2003, permitted the OA to be withdrawn to enable private respondent No 4, who was the applicant before the Tribunal, to pursue his representation before the authorities with regard to the papers he had submitted in respect of property. The matter was then considered by the Chief Post Master General, Bihar Circle, Patna who, by his detailed order dated 14.07.2004 (Annexure 4) rejected the representation of private respondent No 4. Private respondent No 4, before him, had challenged and produced new documents as well in support of the plea that he had landed property. He had also challenged the documents as produced by the writ petitioner. The Chief Post Master General clearly held that firstly the documents produced by private respondent No 4 were not correct. They related to land which were made available to him for plantation. It did not make him the owner of the land. He then produced others sets of papers which, upon enquiry from the Revenue Section of the State, were found forged and fabricated. Thus, all papers, as produced by private respondent No 4 in support of having landed property, were found to be incorrect or invalid. The papers, as produced by the writ petitioner, were accepted
