Oral order disposing of writ petition seeking intervention from Respondent No. 4. Court allowed prayer to consider representation and pass appropriate order.
Prayer allowed; Respondent No. 4 directed to consider representation (Annexure 6) and pass appropriate order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7170 of 2008
======================================================
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sarva Deo Singh
Mr. Sanjay Kumar
For the Respondent/s : AC to Addl. Advocate General - 5
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
2. 19-03-2015 After some argument, learned counsel for petitioners, in presence of learned A.C. to Addl. Advocate General – 5, makes a prayer for disposal of the writ petition with an indication that the respondent no. 4, before whom the petitioner has filed representation vide Annexure ‘6’ , may consider the representation and pass appropriate order in accordance with law.
The prayer is allowed.
The writ petition stands disposed of with an
Patna High Court CWJC No.7170 of 2008 (2) dt.19-03-2015
2/2
observation that Respondent No. 4, the Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department may consider the representation of these two petitioners i.e. Annexure 6 & 7 and pass appropriate order in
accordance with law.
(Rakesh Kumar, J.)
Anay/-
U
Manoj Kumar
Sukhari Baitha
The State of Bihar
Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Additional Commissioner-cum-Special Secretary
Superintending Engineer, Bhojpur Circle
Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Dehri-on-Sone
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
