5. Learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in each of the writ petitions submitted that the impugned orders passed by the learned District Forum is in the teeth of judgment and order dated 24.09.2008 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14312 of 2007 (M/s Maa Durga Enterprises vs. The State of Bihar & Ors .), since reported in 2009(2) PLJR 1000, therefore, it is wholly without jurisdiction and is fit to be set aside on that ground alone. According to him, on the basis of letter dated 30.10.2007 issued by the Executive Director of BIADA, direction was issued to lock and seal the Cold Storage of the petitioner and accordingly, on 02.11.2007 guards of BIADA were posted there in the premises restraining operation of the Cold Storage and finally on 04.11.2007, the cold storage of the petitioner was formally locked and sealed by the officers of BIADA with the help of the Executive Magistrate and the police force. However, subsequently on 07.11.2007 the premises of the cold storage were unsealed by the officers of BIADA in presence of the Executive Magistrate. It is contended that on account of locking and sealing of the premises of the cold storage, the potatoes kept by the farmers rotted and, therefore, it could not be returned to them. It is further contended that the petitioner, being aggrieved by the aforesaid action of BIADA filed C.W.J.C. No. 14312 of 2007 (M/s Maa Durga Enterprises vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), which was finally allowed by a learned Single Judge of this Court by the aforesaid judgment and order dated 24.09.2008, since reported in 2009(2) PLJR 1000. The thrust of his argument is that pursuant to the aforesaid judgment, BIADA was impleaded as
