Ram Prahlad Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
A thin oral order correcting a typographical error where a respondent advocate's name was accidentally omitted from the judgment text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.6091 of 2015 (4) dt.19-08-2015
| IN THE HIGH CO Civil Writ Ju ==================== Ram Prahlad Singh The State of Bihar & Ors ==================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Respondent/s : |
URT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA risdiction Case No.6091 of 2015 ================================== .... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Respondent/s ================================== Mr. Ram Janam Prasad Mr. Sc22-Kundan Bahadur Singh |
|
|---|---|---|
| ==================== CORAM: HONOURABL ORAL ORDER |
================================== E MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA |
|
| 4 19-08-2015 |
This case has | been brought under the heading ‘to be |
| mentioned’ that someh | ow the name of Mr. Nishi Nath Ojha, who | |
| had appeared for Bihar mentioned in the order This being a ty the name of Mr. Nishi included in the order da |
State Cooperative Bank Ltd., has not been dated 5.8.2015. pographical error, it is hereby directed that Nath Ojha shall be deemed to have been ted 5.8.2015. |
|
| surendra/- U |
(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) |
Ram Prahlad Singh
The State of Bihar & Ors
Mihir Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court