Petitioner withdraws writ application. Court grants liberty to pursue alternative remedies and dismisses the application as withdrawn.
Application dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to pursue other remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.521 of 1996
====================================================== Smt. Indira Sinha, W/o Sri ram Chandra Prasad Singh, resident of village & P.O.- Narsinghpur, P.S.- Musahari, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus
……….. Respondent 2nd Set. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushkar Narain Shahi, Mr. Ratan Kumar Sinha, Mr. Ashutosh Singh and Mr. Dhirendra Kumar (Munna), Advocates For the State : Mr. M.N. Huda Khan, Advocate Mrs. Babita Kumari, A.C. to S.C.-18
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER
6 14-05-2015 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw this writ application with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the remedy available in accordance with law with regard to the properties subject matter of the present dispute.
Learned counsel for the State-respondents has no
objection.
Patna High Court CWJC No.521 of 1996 (6) dt.14-05-2015
2
Prayer is allowed.
The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn
with the aforesaid liberty.
(V. Nath, J)
P.K./-
U
Smt. Indira Sinha
The State of Bihar
The Joint Director, Consolidation, Muzaffarpur
The Consolidation Officer, Dumra
Rameshwar Singh
V. Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
