Disposed

Hasibul Rahaman @ Mir Hifjul @ v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC23 Mar 2015CWJC/5060/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court held that writ petitions involving disputes under the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 fall within the jurisdiction of the Bihar Land Tribunal. The Registry was directed to transmit the records to the Tribunal forthwith.

What did the court decide?

Registry directed to transmit the record of the writ petitions to the Bihar Land Tribunal constituted under the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009.

Hasibul Rahaman @ Mir Hifjul @ Vs the State of Bihar and Ors. — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2619 of 2008

¶2

======================== Hasibul Rahman @ Mir Hifajul	===================== @ Nathun	=========
	.... ....	Petitioner/s
The State of Bihar & Ors	Versus .... ....	Respondent/s
======================= Civil Writ Jurisdi	==================== with ction Case No. 5060 of 2008	=========
======================== Hasibul Rahaman @ Mir Hifjul The State of Bihar & Ors	==================== @ Nathun .... .... Versus .... ....	========= Petitioner/s Respondent/s
======================== Civil Writ Jurisdi	==================== with ction Case No. 8111 of 2008	==========
======================== Hasibul Rahman @ Mir Hifajul	==================== @ Nathun .... .... Versus	========= Petitioner/s
The State of Bihar & Ors ========================	.... .... ====================	Respondent/s ==========
Appearance : (In CWJC No.2619 of 2008)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mr.	Sanjay Kumar Surendra Kumar Choubey
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr.	(Sc14) Makardhwaj Upadhyay Ratnakar Ambastha Sanjay Singh
(In CWJC No.5060 of 2008)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mr.	Sanjay Kumar Surendra Kumar Choubey
For the Respondent/s : Mr.	(Ga4)
Mr. Mr. Mr.	Makardhwaj Upadhyay Ratnakar Ambastha Sanjay Singh
(In CWJC No.8111 of 2008)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mr.	Sanjay Kumar Surendra Kumar Choubey
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Mr.	(Gp6) Kamla Kant Pandey

¶3

Patna High Court CWJC No.2619 of 2008 (8) dt.23-03-2015

¶4

2/2

¶5

Mr. Sheela Pandey Mr. Manish Ranjan Kumar Mr. K.Vishokanand

¶6

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶7

8. 23-03-2015

¶8

In all the aforesaid writ petitions, the dispute is under the provisions of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956, which is a schedule Act as per Section 9 of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009. The Court is of the opinion that these writ petitions can well be adjudicated by the Tribunal constituted under the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009.

¶9

Accordingly, in view of proviso to Section 15 of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009, the Registry is directed to transmit the record of aforesaid cases to the Tribunal forthwith.

¶10

(Rakesh Kumar, J.)

¶11

Anay/-

¶12

Hasibul Rahaman @ Mir Hifjul @ v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hasibul Rahaman @ Mir Hifjul @ v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Bhaddu Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Birju Chouhan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Hasibul Rahman @ Mir Hifajul @ Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Munna Ram and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Ganga Prasad Mandal @ Ganga Ma Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.