This court dismissed a writ application challenging non-selection in a 2010 recruitment. The judge held dismissal was justified as the settled selection cannot be unsettled and the petitioner failed to attend counseling.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4111 of 2015
======================================================
Md. Mashroob Kausar son of Md. Quasim, resident of village Siktihar, Post office Sontha, Police- Station Bahadurganj, District Kishanganj
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Education Secretariat Building, Patna -1
.... .... Respondent/s
There are two reasons for this Court for not interfering with the impugned order, as contained in Annexure 5. First reason is that the settled position cannot be unsettled at the asking and convenience of the petitioner. Selection was made in the year 2010. He had approached the Tribunal only in the year 2014 alleging that he had higher marks. The other reason is that the
Patna High Court CWJC No.4111 of 2015 (2) dt.26-03-2015
2/2
petitioner did not participate in the counseling held, unluck became the reason for his non selection. Both the reasons are valid reasons for dismissing the writ application.
Writ application stands dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
singh/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ application challenging the non-selection of the petitioner should be allowed.
Md. Mashroob Kausar
Tanzeem Raza
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
