The Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking cancellation of a sugar levy license as infructuous. The parties admitted the application became infructuous due to the lapse of time.
The writ petition has been dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3655 of 1998 (6) dt.16-02-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3655 of 1998
======================================================
Versus
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madanjeet Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sandip Singh, A.C. to G.P.-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER
6 16-02-2015 This matter relates to cancellation of license of the levy sugar vide order dated 11.09.1997.
Patna High Court CWJC No.3655 of 1998 (6) dt.16-02-2015
As both the parties submit that on account of lapse of
time, the present application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this writ petition has been dismissed as
infructuous. Vats/U
(Shivaji Pandey, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the existence of a writ petition after the claim has become infructuous.
Whether to dismiss a writ petition on the ground of lapse of time making it infructuous.
Dilip Traders through Shanti Devi
The State of Bihar
The District Magistrate, Gaya
The Sub Divisional Officer, Gaya
The District Supply Officer, Gaya
The District Manager, F.C.I., Gaya
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
