Mridula Sinha Vs B.P.S.C.and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2015)

Dismissed

Mridula Sinha v. B.P.S.C.and Ors.

Patna HC23 Mar 2015CWJC/3618/1999

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ applications dismissed as infructuous.

What the court decided

AI extract

	IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.136 of 1999 ====================================================== Shashi Bala
	.... .... Petitioner/s Versus B.P.S.C. & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ======================================================
	with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3618 of 1999 ====================================================== Mridula Sinha .... .... Petitioner/s Versus B.P.S.C.& Ors .... .... Respondent/s ======================================================
	Appearance : (In both cases) For the Petitioners : For the State : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, AC to AAG 10 For the BPSC : Mr. Kumar Brajendra Nath, Advocate Mr. S.C. Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER
13	23-03-2015 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners.
	Learned counsel for the BPSC submits that these writ applications have become infructuous.
	These writ applications are, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous.
	(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)
BKS/-
U