Petitioner's counsel submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous due to the passage of time. The court disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.320 of 2014
===========================================================
Ali Hasan Ansari S/O Late Rajdin Mian R/O Rdaha, P.S. Thakaraha (Bhitaha) District West Champaran
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. BIMLESH KUMAR PANDEY For the Respondent/s : Mr. MITHILESH KUMAR PATHAK
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 09-02-2015
Counsel for the parties are present.
Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that by passage of time, the writ petition has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.
(Jyoti Saran, J.)
Vats/-
U
Ali Hasan Ansari
The State Of Bihar through The Director, Panchayati Raj, Bihar
The State Election Commission, Bihar
The District Magistrate, Bettiah
The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Bettiah
The Sub-Divisional Officer, Bagaha
Jyoti Saran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
