This was an oral order in a bank consumer dispute writ petition where the petitioner sought leave to withdraw the application, which was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2929 of 2015
====================================================== M/s Maa & Company through its Proprietor, Ajay Kumar S/o Late Bharat Prasad Srivastava, Near Techno Point, Lal Bagh, Tilka Manjhi, P.S. Barasi, District - Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The Chairman Bank of Baroda, Head office Mandvi Baroda 2. The General Manager Bank of Baroda Head of Mandvi Baroda Head of Mandvi Baroda ( Gujrat ) 3. The Zonal Manager Patna Zone Bank of Baroda Patna 4. The Regional Manager Muzaffarpur region Bank of Baroda Muzaffarpur 5. Branch Manager Bank of Baroda Pathakdih Chatpatiya Branch Bhagalpur .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Amarendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Sanjeev Shankar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 2 20-02-2015 After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdrawn this writ application. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Spd/-
U
M/s Maa & Company through its Proprietor, Ajay Kumar
The Chairman Bank of Baroda, Head office Mandvi Baroda
The General Manager Bank of Baroda Head of Mandvi Baroda
The Zonal Manager Patna Zone Bank of Baroda Patna
The Regional Manager Muzaffarpur region Bank of Baroda Muzaffarpur
Branch Manager Bank of Baroda Pathakdih Chatpatiya Branch Bhagalpur
RAVI RANJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
