Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition as grievances were redressed. Permission was accorded, and the petition was dismissed.
Permission accorded to withdraw; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2674 of 2013
====================================================== Md. Waseem Akhtar S/O Late Md. Naseem Akhtar, resident of VillageAmdeeha, P.S. Sadar, District- Darbhanga (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. The Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga 3. The District Collector, Darbhanga 4. The District Supply Officer, Darbhanga 5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Darbhanga .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subhash Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER --------------- 4 01-07-2015 Mr. Subhash Kumar Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that during pendency of this petition, the grievances of the petitioner have been redressed. Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. The present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)
Tahir/-
U
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Md. Waseem Akhtar
The State Of Bihar
Birendra Prasad Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
