Disposed

Dr. Sanjay Kumar Tripathi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC8 Sept 2015CWJC/25198/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition regarding employment anomalies. The court observed that parallel proceedings involving RTI and the writ are unnecessary and directed the petitioner to bring anomalies to the current Principal's knowledge to prevent recurrence.

What did the court decide?

Writ application disposed of; directive to approach current Principal regarding past anomalies.

Dr. Sanjay Kumar Tripathi Vs The State Of Bihar and… — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.25198 of 2013

¶3

=========================================================== Dr. Sanjay Kumar Tripathi, S/O Sri Rabindra Nath Tiwary, Assistant Professor, Department of English, H.D. Jain College, Ara, residing at Madan Jee Ka Hata, Pakadi, Ara, Bhojpur.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶5

The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶6

The District Education Officer, Ara, Bhojpur.

¶7

…….. Respondents 1^st set

¶8

The Veer Kunwar Singh University through its Registrar, Ara, Bhojpur.

¶9

The Vice Chancellor, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara, Bhojpur.

¶10

The Registrar, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara, Bhojpur.

¶11

…….. Respondents 2^nd set 9. The Bihar School Examination Board (Higher Secondary), Budha Marg, Patna through its Director.

¶12

The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board (Higher Secondary) Budha Marg, Patna.

¶13

The Director, Bihar School Examination Board (Higher Secondary), Budha Marg, Patna.

¶14

The Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board (Higher Secondary), Budha Marg, Patna.

¶15

…….. Respondents 3rd set

¶16

The Principal, H.D. Jain College, Ara, Bhojpur.

¶17

…….. Respondents 4^th set

¶18

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Madhukar Krishna Sinha, Advocate

¶19

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 08-09-2015

¶20

The issue raised by the petitioner is also being followed

¶21

up under Right to Information Provisions which have been invoked and initiated by the petitioner.

¶22

For the same cause, two parallel proceedings are not

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.25198 of 2013 dt.08-09-2015

¶24

2/2

¶25

required at the same time. The questions and doubts which the petitioner has raised relates to an earlier period. There is a change in the administration as well as the head of the institution. Let the petitioner bring these anomalies to his knowledge so that the current Principal can make sure that such illegalities do not crop up again as is put up for judicial scrutiny again.

¶26

Writ application is disposed of with the above

¶27

observations.

¶28

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)

¶29

Vats/-

¶30

Dr. Sanjay Kumar Tripathi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Sanjay Kumar Tripathi v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Kumar Singh Vs The Bihar School Examination Board and Anr.

M.g.m. Nursing Training School Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Pravesh Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Raj Kumar Nath Tiwari and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Millia Educational Trust and Vs The National Ouncil For Teachers Education and Anr.

Md. Mustafa Kamal Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.