An oral order dismissed a writ application filed by the petitoners seeking quashing of certain orders passed in batabidari revision and case. The dismissal is due to non-prosecution and not on merits.
Application dismissed for non-prosecution without prejudice to availing remedy under the law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2425 of 1995
======================================================
All residents of village Laxamipur, Lalchand, P.S.- Bihariganj, DistrictMadhepura.
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav, AC to SC-27
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER
The petitioners filed the instant application for quashing of order dated 19.09.1991 passed by the Additional Collector in Bataidari Revision No. 20 of 1991-92 and the order dated 19.08.1991 passed in Bataidari Case no. 273 of 1990-91.
This application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
However, the dismissal of this writ application would
not come in the way of the petitioners for availing remedy under
Patna High Court CWJC No.2425 of 1995 (7) dt.16-04-2015
2 / 2
the law.
(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)
Uday/-
U
Sukamaniya Devi
Vidya Nand Sharma
Jatan Sharma
The State of Bihar
Samarendra Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
