Petitioners sought to quash orders dated 19.09.1991 and 19.08.1991 in land revenue revisions. The writ application was dismissed for non-prosecution, though alternative legal remedies remained available.
The writ application was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2421 of 1995
====================================================== 1. Jai Prakash Sharma @ Laddu Sharma 2. Om Prakash Sharma 3. Lalit Sharma All sons of Kuldeep Sharma, resident of village Debail, Police StateBihariganj, District- Madhepura. .... .... Petitioners Versus 1. State of Bihar
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER
The petitioners filed the instant application for quashing of order dated 19.09.1991 passed by the Additional Collector in Bataidari Revision No. 19 of 1991-92 and the order dated 19.08.1991 passed in Bataidari Case no. 284 of 1990-91. This application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
However, the dismissal of this writ application would
Patna High Court CWJC No.2421 of 1995 (7) dt.16-04-2015
2 / 2
not come in the way of the petitioners for availing remedy under the law.
(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)
Uday/-
U
Jai Prakash Sharma @ Laddu Sharma 2. Om Prakash Sharma 3. Lalit Sharma
State of Bihar
Samarendra Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
