This order dismisses a writ application as infructuous after the respondents withdrew the impugned notification under Section 49 of the Bihar VAT Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.2331 of 2015 (9) dt.01-12-2015
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2331 of 2015 ====================================================== |
|---|
| M/s Shristi Developers Pvt. Ltd. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) |
| 9 01-12-2015 Mr. Vikash Kumar, A.C. to P.A.A.G. states on |
| instructions that the impugned notification under Section 49 of the |
| Bihar VAT Act has been withdrawn by the respondents. |
| In the above circumstances, the writ application has |
| become infructuous and it is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. |
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
V.P.Sinha/- (Sudhir Singh, J) U
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Shristi Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The State of Bihar
Ramesh Kumar Datta
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
