In a writ petition filed by Brahmdeo Mahto, no appearance was made by the petitioner. The respondent submitted that the case has become infructuous. The High Court dismissed the writ due to non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.20194 of 2011 (2) dt.13-07-2015
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20194 of 2011 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
| Brahmdeo Mahto .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Janam Maharaj For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to GP-8 |
|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER |
|
| 2 |
13-07-2015 On call, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner either |
| to press this petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. Learned | |
| AC to GP-8 submits that in view of facts disclosed in the counter affidavit, the writ petition has become infructuous. Be that as it may, since none appeared on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed due to non- |
|
| prosecution, (Rakesh Kumar, J) |
|
| NKS/- U |
Brahmdeo Mahto
The State of Bihar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
