Petitioners filed a writ petition on identical issue already dismissed and affirmed. Court dismissed the writ petition holding no reason to keep matter pending. Oral order.
The writ petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.15669 of 2006 (10) dt.09-07-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15669 of 2006
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anant Kishore Lal Das Mr. Satish Kumar Mr. Nand Kishore Pd.Sinha Mr. Sita Ram Yadav Mr. Prem Shankar Mr. Bipin Kumar Mr. Pradeep Kumar Dubey
For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to GA-5
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
10 09-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AC to GA-5.
The present writ petition has been listed under the heading “For Orders (On Petitions)” for hearing Interlocutory Application i.e. I.A. No.5172 of 2015, whereby a prayer has been
Patna High Court CWJC No.15669 of 2006 (10) dt.09-07-2015
made for amendment in the writ petition.
Candidly, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in another case, on identical issue, a writ petition was dismissed, against which an Appeal vide L.P.A. No.565 of 2013 had been preferred, which too stood dismissed.
Keeping in view the fact that in identical issue, one another writ petition has already been dismissed, which has been affirmed by the Division Bench in L.P.A. No.565 of 2013, there is
no reason to keep the matter pending.
The writ petition stands dismissed.
(Rakesh Kumar, J)
NKS/U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition maintaining identical issue, already dismissed and affirmed by Division Bench, should be allowed to remain pending.
Mahanand Bibhu
Hardeo Mandal
The State of Bihar
The Education Commissioner, Bihar
The Director-cum-Secretary, Primary Education, Bihar
The Special Director, Secondary Education, Bihar
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
