Petitioner withdrew the writ petition seeking appropriate remedy; the Patna High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition with liberty to approach the concerned authority.
Petitioner allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the concerned authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13778 of 2012
====================================================== Ashok Kumar Gupta S/O Sri Rajendra Prasad R/O Nilami Gali, Ward No.4, P.S.-Barh, Distt.-Patna .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India, through Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of India, New Delhi 2. Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of India, New Delhi 3. The Governor, Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai 4. Director, Command Office, Sahara India Bhawan, Kapurthala Complex, Lucknow-226024 5. Zonal Worker, Sahara India, Zonal Office, Boring Road Crossing, Boring Road, Patna 6. Regional Worker, Sahara India, Regional Office, Ranjan Complex, Ranchi Road, Biharsharif, Nalanda 7. Sanjeev Kumar, Code-15415, Office Staff, Barh Sector, Sahara India, 1st Floor, Ramjee Palace, N.H.31, Barh, Patna 8. S.N. Pandey, Sector Worker, Code-4265 Barh Sector, Sahara India, 1st Floor, Ramjee Palace, N.H. 31, Barh, Patna .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 17-07-2015 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner, in presence of Sri Ravindra Kumar Sharma, learned Central Government Counsel, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to avail appropriate remedy. The prayer is allowed. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as indicated above.
It goes without saying that if the petitioner approaches
Patna High Court CWJC No.13778 of 2012 (2) dt.17-07-2015
2/2
the authority concerned, the period consumed by the petitioner, while pursuing the matter i.e. from 30.07.2012 till date, may be excluded while considering the limitation matter.
(Rakesh Kumar, J)
NKS/-
U
Ashok Kumar Gupta
Union of India
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
