The High Court of Patna dismissed a writ petition for want of prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear and demonstrate readiness to argue, despite multiple adjournments.
The application for adjournment is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13456 of 2012 ====================================================== |
|---|
Suryadeo Manjhi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
Appearance : For the State Mr. P. K.Verma, AAG-5 Mr. Mankeshwar Tiwari, AC to AAG 5 |
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER |
| 7 01-12-2015 Again a prayer for adjournment has been made on behalf of the petitioner in presence of the State. |
| Counsel for the State has drawn attention to three |
| previous orders wherefrom it appears that on all occasions the case was adjourned at the instance of the petitioner. The counsel who appears on behalf of the petitioner has shown his inability to argue the case. The application is dismissed for want of prosecution. |
| HR/- (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) |
U
Suryadeo Manjhi
The State of Bihar
KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
