B.T.Act Case No. 4,10,14,16 and 19 of 1990-91 related to the petitions filed by the respondent nos.4 to 8 against the land of the petitioner. After hearing the parties, the Deputy Collector Land Reforms, by common order dated 15.03.1991, rejected all the 23 cases after holding that the claim of bataidari by the petitioner of those cases was not bonafide and prima facie could not be established. In appeal, however, the Collector overturned the findings and directed for initiation of proceeding under Section 48(e) B.T.Act after constituting Board as provided. The order of the Collector was questioned by the present petitioner and other persons by filing several writ applications. The respondent-Bataidars also filed CWJC No. 5971 of 1992 challenging the order dated 15.03.1991 passed by the D.C.L.R. rejecting their claim of Bataidari. By common order dated 03.08.1992 passed in CWJC No. 7103 of 1991 and analogous cases (reported in 1992 (2) PLJR 747), a bench of this Court allowed the writ applications and quashed the orders passed by the Collector. By another order dated 03.08.1992, the CWJC No. 5971 of 1992 filed by the respondent- Bataidars was also dismissed. It would be pertinent to mention that the bench of this Court while allowing the CWJC No. 7103 of 1991 and other analogous case has also recorded the finding in paragraph-13 of the judgment that the respondent-Bataidars have failed to prima facie show the requirements for initiating the
