Civil Writ Jurisdiction case where the petitioner failed to appear. The State counsel contended the disputed salary and leave regularization issues were already resolved. The court dismissed the writ application for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12448 of 2008 ====================================================== Rajendra Pandey .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. Kumar Pankaj, A.C. to S.C. 21 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 4 05-11-2015 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that it is clearly stated in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent nos.2 and 3 that after due consideration of the matter payment of admitted salary for the period explained therein has already been sanctioned and his period of absence as described in the aforesaid paragraph has also been regularized as extraordinary leave as per Rule 180 of the Bihar Service Code vide order no.228
Patna High Court CWJC No.12448 of 2008 (4) dt.05-11-2015
2 / 2
dated 17.09.2015 and the Registrar, Co-operative Society Department has been requested to make payment of due salary to the petitioner. It is contended that, subsequently, the said amount has already been credited to the account of the petitioner.
Be that as it may, since none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, this writ application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)
Sanjay-II/-
U
Rajendra Pandey
The State of Bihar
Ravi Ranjan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
