Dismissed

Buxar Municipality and Anr. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC6 Feb 2015CWJC/1200/1997

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court in a writ jurisdiction case dismissed the petition filed by the Buxar Municipality and others challenging the orders of the District Consumers Redressal Forum and the State of Bihar, finding no error in the Consumer Court's order favoring the complainant. The petition was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition challenging the orders of the District Consumers Redressal Forum was dismissed.

Buxar Municipality and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors. — Consumer Protection | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1200 of 1997

¶3

===========================================================

¶4

Buxar Municipality through its Special Officer

¶5

Sri Shankar Baitha son of Keshwar Baitha, resident of Lalgarh Tola Dharampur, PS-Bettiah, District-West Champaran, at present posted as Special Officer, Buxar Municipality, Buxar.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar. 2. The District Consumers Redressal Forum, Buxar. 3. Gopal Sharma resident of Buxar Pirpati Road, PS-Buxar, District-Buxar.

¶9

.... .... Respondent/s

¶10

===========================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s :

¶13

For the Respondent/s : M/s Madhukar Krishna Sinha and Sunil Kr. Karn

¶14

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT

¶15

Date: 06-02-2015

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶17

counsel for the State.

¶18

In this case the petitioner is Municipality is challenging the order dated 7^th August 1995 passed in Case No. 3 of 1995 and orders dated 5^th February 1996, 23^rd April 1996 and 31^st July 1996.

¶19

It appears from the record that the Municipality by a general notice, invited the persons who are interested to take shops may deposit Rs. 500/- in its Office, accordingly, Mr. Sharma, Respondent no. 3 deposited the same on 13^th December 1991 for allotment of the shop and was granted receipt thereof and thereafter, Mr. Sharma was asked to deposit Rs. 5,000/- which was

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.1200 of 1997 dt.06-02-2015

¶21

2/2

¶22

deposited by him on 26^th February 1992 but the shop could not be given to Mr. Sharma, for that, he requested for return of the money along with the interest. When he was not obliged by the Municipality, he filed a case in the Consumer Court for return of Rs. 5,500/- along with the interest and the Consumer Court passed the order in his favour.

¶23

This Court does not find any error in the order of the

¶24

Consumer Court.

¶25

Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.

¶26

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶27

Mahesh/-

¶28

Buxar Municipality and Anr. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Buxar Municipality and Anr. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishna Kumar Boobna Vs the Union of India and Ors.

Sheikh Israt Khan @ Ali and Ors. Vs State of Bihar and Ors.

M/S Shree Vishnu Cold STORAGEand Vs State of Bihar and Ors.

Satyendra Narayan Singh Vs the Union of India and Ors.

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs the Union of India and Ors.

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs the Union of India and Ors.