The petitioner withdrew the writ petition after struggling out of the dispute. As the matter was no longer pressed, the High Court dismissed it as not pressed by the counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11677 of 2006
====================================================== Munni Devi, wife of Sri Kapildeo Kumar, resident of village-Malik Sarai, P.S.-Islampur, District-Nalanda at Biharsharif .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Commissioner, Patna Division at Patna. 3. The Additional Collector, Nalanda, District-Nalanda. 4. The Circle Officer, Islampur, District-Nalanda. 5. Md.Anisuddin, son of late Bipat Mian, resident of village-Malik Sarai, P.O.and P.S.- Islampur, District-Nalanda. 6. Gauri Devi, wife of late Jageshwar Choubey, resident of villageAmannawa, P.O. and P.S.-Islampur, District-Nalanda, at present residing at HM-57, TV Tower, Bahadurpur Housing Colony, Kankarbagh, Patna-20. 7. Raj Kumari Devi, wife of Saraju Prasad 8. Munna Prasad, son of Saraju Prasad Both residents of village-Malik Sarai, P.O. and P.S.-Islampur, DistrictNalanda. 9. Rameshwar Prasad Singh, son of Kriti Mahto, resident of villageKotma, P.O.-Dariyapur, P.S.-Islampur, District-Nalanda. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ras Bihari Thakur, Adv. For the Respondent nos.1to4 : Mr. Manoj Kumar, AC to GP-10 For the Respondent nos.5, 7to9 : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Sinha, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 6 07-12-2015 Mr. Ras Bihari Thakur, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that, in view of the resolution of the dispute between the parties outside the Court, he has instruction not to press this writ petition. The learned State counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.1 to 4, on the other hand, submits that the writ petition stood dismissed as against the respondent no.6; therefore, it has become incompetent. Be that as it may, without going into that aspect of the matter, since the learned counsel for the petitioner does not
Patna High Court CWJC No.11677 of 2006 (6) dt.07-12-2015
2
want to press this writ petition, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)
Arvind/-
U
Munni Devi
The State of Bihar
The Commissioner, Patna Division
Birendra Prasad Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
