The petitioner withdrew the writ petition. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Prayer for withdrawal of writ petition allowed; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10837 of 2011
| ====================================================== Salim Ansari son of Safique Ansari, resident of village- Itwan, Police Station–Nabinagar, District–Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Collector, Aurangabad. 3. The Additional Collector, Aurangabad. 4. The D.C.L.R. Aurangabad. 5. The Anchaladhikari, Nabinagar Block, District- Aurangabad. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh For the Respondent/s : AC to Addl. Advocate General-8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER |
|
|---|---|
| 3. | 03-07-2015 After some argument, learned counsel for the |
| petitioner, in presence of learned A.C. to Addl. Advocate General –8, makes a prayer for withdrawal of the writ petition so that he may avail appropriate remedy. The prayer is allowed. |
|
| The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. |
(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U
Salim Ansari
The State of Bihar
The Collector, Aurangabad
The Additional Collector, Aurangabad
The D.C.L.R. Aurangabad
The Anchaladhikari, Nabinagar Block
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
