An oral order dismissing a writ application by the petitioner who sought liberty to withdraw it, noting the application was thus not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.10071 of 2015 (2) dt.17-07-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10071 of 2015
====================================================== Krishna Kant Mishra son of late Rashik Lal Mishra resident of VillageTelta, Police Station -Balrampur, District Katihar. .... .... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar through its Secretary, Land and Revenue department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Collector, Katihar, District Katihar. 3. The Circle officer, Balrampur Block, District Katihar. 4. The Headmaster, S.S. High School, Telta, Police station- Balrampur, District Katihar. 5. Khurshid Alam son of late Fajlur Rahman Resident of village- Sihha Gaon, Police Station- Balrampur, District Katihar. .... .... Respondents. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimal Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajeet Kumar, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER 2 17-07-2015 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the writ application. It is wise prayer to make in view of the earlier Division Bench adjudication made at the behest of the petitioner himself. This writ application is dismissed as not pressed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.)
Kamlesh
U
Krishna Kant Mishra
The State of Bihar
The Collector, Katihar
The Circle officer, Balrampur Block
The Headmaster, S.S. High School, Telta
Khurshid Alam
AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
