Dismissed

Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC23 Jul 2015CR. REV./55/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In two criminal revisions, the Patna High Court refused to release the petitioner on bail. The Court directed the Juvenile Justice Board to complete the enquiry within five months and ordered the trial court to summon witnesses urgently. The relief explicitly stated that pending the five-month limit, the petitioner is not entitled to bail.

What did the court decide?

Application for bail rejected; direction to complete enquiry in five months; directions to summon witnesses fixed.

Jyoti Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Revision No.52 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- SARAN =========================================================== 1. Manish Kumar Singh @ Manish Kr. Singh @ Manish Son of Hardeo Singh, Resident of Village - Pirari, P.S. - Jalalpur, District - Saran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s with =========================================================== Criminal Revision No. 55 of 2015

¶4

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- SARAN

¶5

=========================================================== 1. Jyoti Kumari daughter of Hardeo Singh Resident of Village Pirari, P.S. jalalpur, Distt- Saran

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Respondent/s

¶8

=========================================================== Appearance :

¶9

(In CR. REV. No. 52 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. (In CR. REV. No. 55 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr.

¶10

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23-07-2015

¶11

Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to

¶12

release the petitioner.

¶13

In view of the report of Juvenile Justice Board that he is trying to complete the enquiry within five months, the application is rejected with direction to the Juvenile Justice Board to complete the enquiry within a period of five months without giving any

¶14

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.52 of 2015 dt.23-07-2015

¶15

2/2

¶16

unnecessary adjournment to any party for which reason the trial Court will send a list of witnesses fixing specific dates for their examination along with a copy of this order to the concerned Superintendent of Police who is directed to ensure the attendance of the witnesses on the date fixed so that there is no further delay in the trial.

¶17

It is made clear that even if the enquiry is not completed within five months the petitioner would not be entitled for bail.

¶18

(Anjana Prakash, J)

¶19

Prakash/U T

Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Thakur Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Sagir@Sagir Ahmad and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Ranjan Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Samsul Nesha @ Samsun Nisha and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sunita Devi @ Suganti Devi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rahul Kumar @ Mohit Anand Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar