Allowed

Asgar Hussain v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC7 Sept 2015CR. MISC./9783/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court, by single judge order, granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, a husband accused in a matrimonial cruelty case. The court ordered a monthly maintenance payment by the petitioner pending resolution of the divorce dispute and directed the trial court to expedite proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on furnishing bond with two sureties, subject to monthly maintenance payments and direction to expedite trial.

Asgar Hussain Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.9783 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3191 Year- 2010 Thana -MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- MUZAFFARPUR

¶3

====================================================== 1. Asgar Hussain son of Late Wajahat Hussain resident of Mohalla - Bhabdepur Main Road Sitamarhi, Police Station - Sitamarhi District and Town - Sitamarhi.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

Ruhi Hussain D/o Hashmat Karim R/o Mohalla - Tinkathiya, P.S. - Mithanpura, Dist. - Muzaffarpur.

¶8

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Anisur Rahman For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ansar-Ul-Haque (App)

¶11

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶12

6 07-09-2015 Petitioner being husband of the complainant apprehending his arrest in a complaint case wherein processes were directed to be issued after cognizance being taken for the offences under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶13

The marriage between the petitioner and the complainant and birth of three children are admitted facts. The petitioner claims to have divorced the complainant as per muslim rituals in 2002. The factum of divorce is being denied by the counsel for the complainant.

¶14

Considering the dispute with regard to

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9783 of 2015 (6) dt.07-09-2015

¶16

2/3

¶17

factum of divorce the reconciliation does not appear to be feasible at present nor the said dispute can be resolved in the present proceeding.

¶18

In the alternative, petitioner is ready to make payment Rs. 5000/- to the complainant for the welfare of the complainant and the children from October, 2015, by depositing the same in the bank account of the complainant by second week of every month without being prejudiced to the claim of divorce and its legal implications in law. The offer is acceptable to the complainant who undertakes to supply her bank account number within a period of three weeks by submitting the same on affidavit before learned Court below.

¶19

Considering the present stand of the parties, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Complaint Case No. 3191 of 2010, Trial No. 1475 of 2014.

¶20

The aforesaid payments will be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceeding.

¶21

Three consecutive defaults in making payment will give liberty to the complainant to file appropriate

¶22

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9783 of 2015 (6) dt.07-09-2015

¶23

3/3

¶24

application for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
Let learned Court below expedite the trial.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
Shageer/-
U T

Asgar Hussain v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Asgar Hussain v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Kumar Chaudhary @ Mukesh Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Chandra Singh and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rita Devi and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Nawlesh Rai Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ajit Kumar Rai @ Manish Ojha Vs The State Of Bihar

Rosaheb Ansari @ Rosaheb Nat Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.