Allowed

Hare Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC21 May 2015CR. MISC./7977/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application connected to an offence under Sections 366A/34 IPC, the High Court granted release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount, noting discrepancies in the prosecution's narrative regarding the victim's recovery.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each.

Hare Ram Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7977 of 2015 (3) dt.21-05-2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.7977 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -122 Year- 2014 Thana -MUNGER MUFFASIL District- MUNGER ====================================================== 1. Hare Ram Singh Son of Gariban Singh resident of village Laxmipur, Gaira Pahar, P.S. Muffasil, District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamal Kishore Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Lal(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 3 21-05-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 27.08.2014 in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

The present case was lodged on 26.06.2014 against the petitioner and his father. After institution of the present case, the house of the petitioner was raided on the same day and the petitioner was found absent from his house and the victim was also not recovered from his house. Subsequently, on 30.06.2014, the investigating officer got an information in respect of the victim and thereafter, he came in the village of the victim and saw that the victim was going along with a boy and the aforesaid boy

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7977 of 2015 (3) dt.21-05-2015

¶6

having seen the police officials fled away from there and victim was recovered.

¶7

No doubt, the victim stated against the petitioner but

¶8

the above stated circumstances tell a different story.

¶9

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-III, Munger in connection with Sessions Trial No. 899 of 2014 arising out of Muffasil P.S. Case No. 122 of 2014.

¶10

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶11

SHAHZAD/-

¶12

U T

Hare Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hare Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anup Lal Tuddu Vs The State Of Bihar

Dhiro Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Dhanesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Karan Kumar Sonkhar @ Karan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ajay Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Hariom Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar