Allowed

Lallan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC6 Apr 2015CR. MISC./6742/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to an auto rickshaw driver arrested during a robbery investigation, where he was only accused of fleeing with the robbers. The court noted his lack of criminal antecedents and the absence of a test identification parade after several months in jail.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

Lallan Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6742 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -787 Year- 2014 Thana -SITAMARHI District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== 1. Lallan Singh Son of Rajendra Singh Resident of Village - Garhan, P.S.Ahiyapur, District -Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinesh Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 3 06-04-2015 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks bail in Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 787 of 2014, registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3

The informant made allegation that while he was going on an auto rickshaw, two passengers were sitting therein from before and they snatched his bag containing Rs. 60,000/-. The informant further alleged that the driver of the auto rickshaw also fled with the accused persons who robbed him.

¶4

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the driver of the auto rickshaw. His auto rickshaw was stolen and later on he came to know that his auto rickshaw was parked in a police station. When the petitioner went to see his auto

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6742 of 2015 (3) dt.06-04-2015

¶6

2/2

¶7

rickshaw the petitioner was apprehended. The petitioner was not put on test identification parade and he is in jail since 12.09.2014.

¶8

It appears that the petitioner is the driver of the auto rickshaw and there is no allegation against him that he committed robbery, but the informant alleged that the petitioner being the driver of the auto rickshaw also fled away along with the robbers. The petitioner was not put on test identification parade and he has also got no criminal antecedent.

¶9

Considering the facts aforesaid and the fact that the petitioner has already remained in jail for about seven months, he above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 787 of 2014.

¶10

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.)

¶11

KKSINHA/-

¶12

U T

Lallan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lallan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar @ Guddu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Israyeel Vs The State Of Bihar

Shanni Kumar @ Shani Chand @ Sunny Kumar @ Sunny Chand Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Rajbanshi Vs The State Of Bihar

Pravesh Mukhiya Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Agrawal Vs The State Of Bihar