Allowed

Happu Mian @ Happu Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC5 May 2015CR. MISC./6155/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving serious offences. The court noted the co-accused were acquitted and the trial would not conclude soon in the near future. Bail was granted on furnishing a bond of 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the CJM, Patna.

Happu Mian @ Happu Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.6155 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -109 Year- 2002 Thana -GARDANIBAGH District- PATNA

¶3

====================================================== Happu Mian @ Happu Ansari .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shakil Ahmad Khan, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 05-05-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail since 26.10.2010 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 324 and 449/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

It is alleged that on 13.02.2002, the miscreants entered into the house of the informant, assaulted the father of the informant and when the mother of the informant went to rescue, she was also assaulted. Subsequently the father of the informant succumbed to the injuries when Sections 396 and 120B of the IPC were also added.

¶5

The petitioner surrendered on 26.10.2010. A report was called for from learned CJM, Patna vide order dated 16.02.2015 as under what circumstances the case was not committed to the court of sessions. The report of learned CJM

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6155 of 2015 (3) dt.05-05-2015

¶7

2/2

¶8

dated 29.04.2015 at Flag-‘X’ does not reflect the reason for noncommittal of the case to the court of sessions. Now the case has been committed to the court of sessions on 20.04.2015.

¶9

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that co-accused have been acquitted vide S. Tr. No. 53 of 2006 by a judgment dated 30.08.2008 passed by learned 1^st Addl. Sessions Judge, Patna. The said judgment has been brought on record as Annexure-2.

¶10

Considering the period under custody, co-accused being acquitted and there is no likelihood of trial being concluded in near future, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Patna in connection with Gardani Bagh P.S. Case No. 109 of 2002.

¶11

Learned trial court will positively cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner if he defaults for two consecutive occasions or gets involved in some serious nature of offence.

¶12

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶13

Amrendra/-

¶14

U T

Happu Mian @ Happu Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Happu Mian @ Happu Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjiv Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Yogi @ Yogendra Madhesiya and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Gorakh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Haidar Ali Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Balister Chauhan @ Basisth Chauhan Vs The State Of Bihar

Indrajeet Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar