Allowed

Sohan Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC10 Feb 2015CR. MISC./5373/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order granting bail to petitioner Sohan Thakur who was in custody for an alleged robbery. Court noted the co-accused on whose statement petitioner's name appeared had been granted bail and petitioner had not yet undergone Timing of Identification Parade.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount.

Sohan Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5373 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -535 Year- 2014 Thana -SITAMARHI District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== 1. Sohan Thakur Son of Laxaman Thakur R/o Village - Bakhari, P.S AND District - Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Singh(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 10-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is languishing in custody since 20.10.2014 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. The motorcycle of the informant was robbed which was subsequently recovered in an abandoned condition. The name of the petitioner sprang up on the confessional statement of co-accused Anil Kumar Mahto.

¶4

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has not been put on T.I.P. till date and the co-accused Anil Kumar Mahto on whose confessional statement the name of the petitioner has been surfaced has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 42573 of 2014.

¶5

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5373 of 2015 (4) dt.10-02-2015

¶7

¶8

named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 535 of 2014.

¶9

Considering the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, the learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner, if he substantially gets involved in some serious nature of the offence or defaults for two consecutive occasions.

¶10

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶11

P.K./-

¶12

U T

Sohan Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sohan Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Salim @ Md. Salim Kuraishi Vs The State Of Bihar

Avinish Kumar @ Awanish Kumar @ Chhotu Vs The State Of Bihar

Binita Ranjan @ Vinita Ranjan @ Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Birbal Mandal @ Biro Mandal @ Bino Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Surendra Lal Mahto @ Surendra Prabhakar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Dhananjay Tiwary @ Bhalu Vs The State Of Bihar