Allowed

Ram Awatar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC16 Dec 2015CR. MISC./53570/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed an application by the petitioner to extend the timeline for depositing the second installment of a defalcated amount by one month and to extend the provisional bail period from six to seven months.

What did the court decide?

Extended the period for deposit of the second installment by one month; extended provisional bail from six months to seven months.

Ram Awatar Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar — Patna HC (2015) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.53570 of 2015

¶2

====================================================== 1. Ram Awatar Gupta, M/s Vaishano Flood Product, Bandipur, Son of Late Chaturi Sah, R/o Village Akorhi, Ramgarh, District- Kaimur. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Indu Bala Pandey(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 2 16-12-2015 Heard the Counsel for the petitioner, the APP for the State and Mr. Awadhesh Kumar for the Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation.

¶3

The application seeks modification in the order dated 09.07.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 25947 of 2015. It is stated that in the light of the said order, the petitioner surrendered and deposited 15 % of the misappropriated amount as depicted in the F.I.R. whereafter he was released on provisional bail for a period of 06 months which is going to expire in January, 2016. The petitioner has difficulty in doing so owing to the reasons spelt out in paragraph 5 of the application. It has been stated that the amount as ordered by this Court shall be deposited provided a period of one month time is extended and further no such application shall be filed.

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53570 of 2015 (2) dt.16-12-2015

¶5

2/2

¶6

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed. The period granted under order dated 09.07.2015 for deposit of second installment of the defalcated amount to be deposited by the petitioner is extended by one month. The period for which the petitioner shall remain on provisional bail as directed in the said order shall now be read as ‘07 months’ in place of ‘06 months’.

¶7

The application is disposed of.

¶8

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)

¶9

Pankaj/-

¶10

U T

Ram Awatar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Awatar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abinash Kumar Rai @ Abinash Rai @ Avinash Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Krishna Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Buchchi Mukhiya Vs The State Of Bihar

Raju Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Kamlesh Sah @ Kamlesh Saw Vs The State Of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar