Sikander Yadav @ Sikendar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court at Patna rejected the petitioner's application for pre-arrest bail in a cheating case due to recovery of stolen goods from his premises.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.52914 of 2015
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -180 Year- 2006 Thana -MADHEPURA District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Sikander Yadav @ Sikendar Yadav son of late Bhumil Yadav resident of Bhirkhi, Ward No. 16, P.S. and District- Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bam Bahadur Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 10-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Madhepura P. S. Case No. 180 of 2006 registered under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.
Regard being had to the recovery of a stolen diesel pump set from the cow-shed of the petitioner’s house, I am not inclined to grant him anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)
Kanchan/-
U T
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted despite recovery of stolen property from the petitioner's house.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sikander Yadav @ Sikendar Yadav
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Ashwani Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court