The learned counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition after a correction in the offence description was permitted. On consent, the court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition was allowed; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.51312 of 2015
| Arising Out of PS.Case No. -123 Year- 2014 Thana -MARAUNA District- SUPAUL |
|
|---|---|
| ====================================================== 1. Md. Abul Kalam son of Md. Shaiyeedul Haque resident of village- Khokhanaha, Amin Tola, P.S.- Marauna, District- Supaul .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhav Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy-I(App) ====================================================== |
|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER |
|
| 2 |
17-12-2015 The learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to |
| make correction in paragraph 1 of the bail petition with regard to offence alleged. |
|
| After some argument, the learned counsel for the | |
| petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail petition. Prayer is allowed. |
|
| This anticipatory bail petition is, accordingly, |
|
| dismissed as withdrawn. | |
| (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) | |
| BKS/- | |
| U | T |
Md. Abul Kalam
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
