Allowed

Nagendra Nath Jha v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC27 Apr 2015CR. MISC./50178/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an anticipatory bail order where the court released the petitioner on bail in a case involving offences under Sections 467, 468, and 471 IPC, subject to specific conditions, considering the petitioner was not sent up for trial after investigation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail in connection with P.S. Case No. 322 of 2009 subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. including bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Nagendra Nath Jha Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.50178 of 2014

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -322 Year- 2009 Thana -SAHARSA District- SAHARSA ====================================================== 1. Nagendra Nath Jha son of Late Shree Nandan Jha resident of Mohalla : Manas Nagar, Hatiagachhi, Ward no. 32, P.S. Saharsa, District : Saharsa, the Ex-Incharge, Head Assistant District Record Room, Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sameer Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gajendra Prasad Yadav (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶3

3 27-04-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 467,468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

It is alleged by the Incharge Officer-cum-Assistant Settlement Officer, Saharsa that in the government records some interpolations were made by the petitioner and co accused Ajay Kumar Mishra, Sunita Devi and Yogendra Poddar. Other accused persons were charge sheeted but the petitioner was not sent up for trial but differing with the final form cognizance was taken against the petitioner also on 17.7.2014.

¶5

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50178 of 2014 (3) dt.27-04-2015

¶7

2/2

¶8

that the petitioner was Assistant in the Collectorate and interpolation was made in the revenue section and on conclusion of investigation the petitioner was not sent up for trial.

¶9

Considering the fact that after investigation the petitioner was not sent up for trial, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa P.S. Case No. 322 of 2009 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶10

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶11

Anil/U T

Nagendra Nath Jha v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nagendra Nath Jha v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhola Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Karu @ Satish Mahto and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Maksud Alam Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ramjee Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar