The High Court at Patna dismissed the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail as withdrawn. The judge declined to grant anticipatory bail at the time of hearing due to the serious nature of the allegations but permitted the withdrawal of the application.
Leave to withdraw application granted; Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.49341 of 2015
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -239 Year- 2014 Thana -CHATOUNI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Jai Narayan Yadav son of Yogendra Singh, Resident of Village- Ruphara, P.S- Shikarganj (Chiraiya), District- East- Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 03-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Taking into consideration serious nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the application. Leave is granted. The application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
Md.S./-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in view of the serious nature of allegations?
Jai Narayan Yadav
The State of Bihar
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
