Allowed

Kare Sharma and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC3 Mar 2015CR. MISC./49293/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to two petitioners, Kare Sharma and Anup Lal Sharma, who are in custody regarding a murder case. The court allowed their bail application based on the rule that a co-accused in similar circumstances had already been granted bail.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement of petitioners on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each, subject to conditions of blood relative bailsman and physical presence.

Kare Sharma and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.49293 of 2014

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -4 Year- 2014 Thana -DHOLBAJJA District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== 1. Kare Sharma , son of Anup Lal Sharma 2. Anup Lal Sharma son of Puran Sharma Both are resident of village Jabrudas Tola Police Station ( Kadwa) Dholbajja District Bhagapur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 03-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor. Two petitioners, who are in custody in connection with Sessions Trial No. 663 of 2014 arising out of Dholbajja (Kadwa) P.S. Case No. 4 of 2014 registered for the offence under Section 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act have prayed for grant of bail.

¶3

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that F.I.R. was lodged against unknown. However, subsequently on suspicion petitioners along with three other persons were made accused. He has argued that one of the similarly situated co -accused namely Mahesh Mandal has been extended the privilege of bail by this court by order dated 25.9.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33911 of

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49293 of 2014 (2) dt.03-03-2015

¶5

2/2

¶6

¶7

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer of the petitioners. However, he was not in a position to distinguish the case of the petitioners with the co- accused who has been granted bail.

¶8

Keeping in view the fact that co –accused, almost in similar circumstances, has already been granted bail, there is no reason to refuse the prayer for bail to the petitioners.

¶9

Let both the petitioners namely Kare Sharma and Anup Lal be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned IInd Additional District And Sessions Judge, Naugachia in connection with S.T. No. 663 of 2014 arising out of Dholbajja (Kadwa) P.S. Case No. 4 of 2014 on a condition that one of the bailors must be blood relative of the petitioners and secondly during the trial before the court below both the petitioners shall remain physically present on each and every date. If continuously on two dates the petitioners remain absent without prior permission of the trial court their bail bond shall stand automatically cancelled.

¶10

(Rakesh Kumar, J)

¶11

Praful/U T

Kare Sharma and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kare Sharma and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagnarayan Singh and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Shyam Sundar Sharma Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Rabindra Nath Chaturvedi Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Salim Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar

Anjish Kumar Patel Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Iboo @ Ibran @ Ibrahim and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar