Allowed

Uma Shankar Mishra and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC14 Dec 2015CR. MISC./49280/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a petition for anticipatory bail, the High Court released the petitioners on bail pending surrender or arrest in a case under sections of the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, fixing a bond of Rs. 5,000 each with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail of Rs. 5000/- each with two sureties of like amount upon personal appearance within six weeks or if arrested/surrendered.

Uma Shankar Mishra and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.49280 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No. -50 Year- 2008 Thana -EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)

¶3

====================================================== 1. Uma Shankar Mishra, son of Late Sukhdeo Mishra 2. Jhunjhun Mishra, son of Uma Shankar Mishra, 3. Umarawati Devi, wife of Uma Shankar Mishra, All Residents of Village- Parsauni, P.S.- Paharpur, District- East Champaran.

¶4

1. Madan Pandey, son of Ram Swaroop Pandey, Resident of VillageBarwa Areraj, P.S.- Govindganj, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioners

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

Baiju Chaudhary, son of Late Amar Chaudhary, Resident of VillageJogiyad Janerwa, Areraj, P.S.- Govindganj, Dist.- East Champaran. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhurendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan (Spl. Pp)

¶8

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶9

3 14-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case under Sections 341, 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 (1) (x) of the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the informant is a labourer of son-in-law of petitioner nos.1 and 3 and the daughter of petitioner nos. 1 and 3, namely, Sudha Devi, filed a complaint case against her husband under Section 498 (A) of the

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49280 of 2015 (3) dt.14-12-2015

¶12

2 / 2

¶13

Indian Penal Code, in which petitioner no.4 is the witness. Learned counsel further submits that the instant case has been filed at the behest of son-in-law of petitioner nos. 1 and 3 through his labourer. He further submits that no case under Section 3 (1) (x) of the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act would be made out, as the offence took place in the house and not in the public place.

¶14

In the circumstances, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Complaint Case no. 50 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

¶15

(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)

¶16

Uday/-

¶17

U T

Uma Shankar Mishra and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uma Shankar Mishra and Ors. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar Tripathi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Niraj Kumar Ranjan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Samidur Rahman Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Prakash Chandra Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Raj Kumar Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhotu Paswan @ Chhotu Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar