Allowed

Ashok Prasad and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC2 Nov 2015CR. MISC./47542/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed an application for regular bail filed by two petitioners accused of offences under Sections 364, 511, and 384/34 IPC. The court accepted the contention that the case was a false accusation stemming from a family civil dispute and ordered the release on bail subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail by furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties and undertaking to appear in court.

Ashok Prasad and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.47542 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -21 Year- 2015 Thana -KADIRGANJ District- PATNA ====================================================== 1. Ashok Prasad S/o Late Jag Narayan Prasad 2. Ram Chandra Prasad @ Ram Chand Prasad S/o Late Jag Narayan Prasad Both are resident of village- Pokharpar, P.S.- Kadirganj, District- Patna ....... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate Mrs. Meena Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶4

2 02-11-2015 This is an application for grant of regular bail in favour of the petitioners who are accused in Kadirganj PS Case No. 21 of 2015 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 364, 511, 384/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

Learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that civil dispute between the parties is the reason behind the institution of the present false case. He contends that the petitioners are the nephews of the informant and other coaccused persons are full brothers of the informant. He further submits that out of the said civil dispute, the informant has got instituted several cases against these petitioners and others.

¶6

I find substance in the submission made on behalf

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47542 of 2015 (2) dt.02-11-2015

¶8

2/2

¶9

of the petitioners that civil dispute between the parties is the reason behind the occurrence and accusation against these petitioners.

¶10

Considering the submission as above, this application is allowed.

¶11

Let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Shri C M Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, Masaurhi, District Patna in Kadirganj PS Case No.21 of 2015.

¶12

This is subject to the condition that the petitioners shall present themselves before the Police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶13

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶14

mrl

¶15

U T

Ashok Prasad and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashok Prasad and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Afshar Alam @ Munna @ Afsar Alam Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Uma Shankar Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Mochhu Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Surendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Natho Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Umesh Rai Vs The State Of Bihar