Biru @ Biran Jamadar v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's bail application again, finding no fresh grounds. It directed the trial court to conclude the trial within one year, allowing a bail renewal if the trial is delayed.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for bail again rejected; trial directed to conclude within one year; liberty to renew bail prayer if trial delayed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.46993 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -375 Year- 2000 Thana -CHANDI District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Biru @ Biran Jamadar Son of late Shiv Nath @ Shivnath Jamadar Residnet of Village - Mahtarma P.S- Tharthari, Distt - Nalanda .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabindra Prasad Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dashrath Mehta (A.P.P.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 3 28-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 261 of 2013 arising out of Chandi (Nagarnausa) P.S. Case No. 375 of 2000 registered under Sections 341, 326, 307, 120B and 34 of the I.P.C. and 27 of the Arms Act. Prayer of the petitioner was earlier rejected vide Cr. Misc. No. 35165 of 2013 on 24.03.2014 by this Court taking into consideration the nature of injuries. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, I find no fresh ground to reconsider the prayer of the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for bail is
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46993 of 2014 (3) dt.28-01-2015
2/2
again rejected.
However, the trial Court is directed to conclude the trial of the petitioner within a period of one year from the date of communication/production of the copy of this order. If the trial is not concluded within the aforesaid period, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the prayer for bail should be reconsidered on fresh grounds.
Whether the trial court should conclude the trial within a specified time limit.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Biru @ Biran Jamadar
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Rajendra Kumar Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court