Allowed

Kari Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC4 Mar 2015CR. MISC./45603/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court disposed of two criminal miscellaneous petitions seeking regular bail under IPC 302/34 and the Arms Act 27. Finding the petitioners were in jail since the arrest, the Court enlarged them on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners enlarged on regular bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount to C.J.M., Begusarai.

Kari Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.45603 of 2014

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -213 Year- 2014 Thana -BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBEGUSARAI ====================================================== 1. Kari Yadav Son of Sri Kajo Yadav R/o Village Dumri, P.S. Mufassil (Singhaul), District Begusarai .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.45922 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -213 Year- 2014 Thana -BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBEGUSARAI ====================================================== 1. Janardan Singh S/o Late Shivnandan Singh resident of Village Dumri, P.S. Muffasil (Singhaul O.P.) District Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In Cr.Misc. No.45603 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arbind Kr.Pandey(App) (In Cr.Misc. No.45922 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Ray For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Durgesh Nandan(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 04-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

¶3

Since both the applications arise out of the same Mufassil (Singhaul O.P. ) P.S. Case No. 213 of 2014, they have

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45603 of 2014 (2) dt.04-03-2015

¶5

¶6

been heard together and are being disposed of by this common

¶7

order.

¶8

The petitioners seek regular bail in a case under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶9

It is alleged that the informant, his sons Binod Singh, Subodh Singh and grand son Bindeshwar Singh went to the mango orchard. It is alleged that on the order of Janardan Singh, Rajnish Singh, Rajesh Singh and Rakesh Singh made firing. Then Subodh Singh, son of the informant started fleeing away. Kari Yadav, petitioner of Criminal Misc. No. 45603 of 2014 is alleged to have surrounded Subodh Singh from the front on which Rajnish Singh fired on the temple of Subodh Singh. Thereafter Rajesh Singh and Rakesh Singh made firing on the head of Subodh Singh as a result of which Subodh Singh died on the spot.

¶10

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner Janardan Singh is only an order giver and Kari Yadav is alleged to have put hindrance to Subodh Singh in fleeing away from the Orchard but Kari Yadav was not armed with any weapon. His land is situated adjacent to the orchard.

¶11

Sri Akhileshwar Prasad Singh, appearing for the informant has, however, vehemently opposed the prayer but submitted

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45603 of 2014 (2) dt.04-03-2015

¶13

¶14

that of course there is no allegation of firing against petitioner Kari Yadav and Janardan Singh is an order giver.

¶15

Having Considered the fact that petitioner Janardan Singh is an order giver and petitioner Kari Yadav is said to have obstructed Subodh Singh from fleeing away from the place of occurrence and that they are in jail since 12.07.2014 and 09.06.2014 respectively, the above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Begusarai Mufassil (Singhaul O.P.) P.S. case No.213 of 2014.

¶16

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶17

Amin/-

¶18

Kari Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kari Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Kumar Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Devendra Singh @ Devendra Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Lal Babu Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Saroj Thakur Vs The State Of Bihar