Petitioners charged with murder andculpable homicide sought bail remitted in a prior order this Court declined bail due to-serious allegations and directed day-to-day trial.
Bail not granted; trial court directed to conclude trial within nine months on day-to-day basis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.44646 of 2015
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -242 Year- 2013 Thana -KARAKAT District- SASARAM (ROHTAS)
====================================================== 1. Sukesh Saw, Son of Bindeshwari Saw, Resident of Village - Malpura, P.S. - Karakat, District - Rohtas 2. Shankar Choudhary @ Shiv Shankar Chaudhary, S/o Digraj Chaudhary Resident of Village - Malpura, P.S. - Karakat, District - Rohtas .... .... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narsing Tanti, APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 07-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioners seek bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 378/2014 arising out of Karakat P.S. Case No. 242 of 2013 registered under Sections 302 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prayer for bail of the petitioners was earlier rejected by this Court on merits vide order dated 21.07.2014.
It is contended that though the petitioners are in custody since 27th November, 2013, till date only two witnesses
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44646 of 2015 (2) dt.07-10-2015
2 / 2
could be examined on behalf of the prosecution.
Be that as it may, regard being had to the serious nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners for the present.
The trial court is directed to hold the trial of the petitioners on day-to-day basis and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within nine months from today failing which the petitioners would be at liberty to renew their prayer
for bail before the trial court itself.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)
Sanjeet/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners charged with punishable offences in a serious assault case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sukesh Saw
Shankar Choudhary
The State of Bihar
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
