Dismissed

Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjit Mahto @ Sanjeev Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC2 Feb 2015CR. MISC./4368/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On an application for anticipatory bail, the Patna High Court rejected the prayer given the nature of the alleged assault. The court directed the petitioners to surrender within four weeks to seek regular bail before the Sessions Judge.

What did the court decide?

Prayer rejected. Petitioners directed to surrender within four weeks to seek regular bail.

Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjit Mahto @ Sanjeev Kumar and Anr. Vs The… — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.4368 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -16 Year- 2014 Thana -KANHAULI District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== 1. Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjit Mahto @ Sanjeev Kumar S/o Shri Bhola Mahto 2. Ranjeet Kumar S/o Shri Bhola Mahto Both Resident of Village Kanhauli, P.S. Kanhauli, District Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha-3 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.Dayal(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 02-02-2015 Heard both the sides. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Kanhauli P.S.Case No. 167/2004 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 308, 354, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are alleged to have assaulted the mother and father of the informant with Farsa and had also torn the cloth of his mother. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the petitioners are innocent and on account of flow of drainage, the occurrence took place and the injuries found on the persons of the parents of the informant are simple in nature. Other accused

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4368 of 2015 (2) dt.02-02-2015

¶5

2/2

¶6

persons have already been enlarged on anticipatory bail by the learned Sessions Judge.

¶7

From records it appears that the petitioners Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjit Mahto @ Sanjeev Kumar and Ranjeet Kuamr are alleged to have assaulted the mother and father of the informant and had torn the cloth of the mother.

¶8

Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer is rejected.

¶9

However, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the court below within four weeks from today in connection with Kanhauli P.S.Case No. 16/2004 pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Sitamarhi, and make prayer for regular bail. The court below shall consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner keeping in mind that the injuries found on the persons of the parents of the informant are simple and dispose of on the same day without being prejudiced by this order.

¶10

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶11

singh/-

¶12

U T

Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjit Mahto @ Sanjeev Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjit Mahto @ Sanjeev Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi Kumar Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Shyam Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Dev Kumar @ Mirdul Kumar @ Mukesh Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Pandey and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Deepak Keshari @ Dipak Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Jhabu Lal Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar