Dismissed

Kishore Prasad @ Brij Kishore Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC10 Apr 2015CR. MISC./42719/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Privately framed order rejecting bail in a criminal proceedings involving poisoning and snatching. Court declined bail due to severity of allegations and prior similar case in custody, directing commitment to Session Court and priority trial.

What did the court decide?

Bail prayer rejected; petitioner directed to be committed to Session Court for priority trial.

Kishore Prasad @ Brij Kishore Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42719 of 2014

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -13 Year- 2014 Thana -WEST CHAMPARAN GRP CASE DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Kishore Prasad @ Brij Kishore Prasad S/o Late Deenanath Prasad r/o Village - Gyanbabu Chauk, P.S. - Motihari (T), District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar No.1, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER --------------

¶3

4 10-04-2015 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks bail in a criminal prosecution registered under Sections 328, 379 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

Taking into consideration the fact that the occurrence in question had taken place on a Railway Station, when the informant along with his family members got down from a train where the petitioner is alleged to have administered poison and snatched Rs.40,000/- in cash, and further taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is involved in same type of another criminal case also from before which finds mentioned in paragraph 3 of the application, this Court is not inclined to accede to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail at this stage. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in connection with Sugauli Rail P.S.Case No. 13 of 2014 pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate (Railway), Bettiah is rejected for the present.

¶5

Learned Judicial Magistrate (Railway), Bettiah, who

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42719 of 2014 (4) dt.10-04-2015

¶7

2/2

¶8

is in seisin of the case, is directed to commit the case of the petitioner to the court of session, if not already committed, within a maximum period of one month from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. On such commitment, endeavour shall be made to take up the trial of the petitioner on priority basis and conclude the same at an early date.

¶9

However, if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within a period of one year from the date of framing of charge without there being any fault on the part of the petitioner, he shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail before the learned trial court itself.

¶10

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)

¶11

Tahir/-

¶12

U T

Kishore Prasad @ Brij Kishore Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishore Prasad @ Brij Kishore Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chittaranjan Jha @ Chitranjan Jha Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Md. Hamid and Anr. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ajay Kumar Gupta Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava @ Ashish Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajan Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar