Dismissed

Madhav Sah and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC9 Oct 2015CR. MISC./42373/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral order in a criminal miscellaneous matter. The High Court rejected the petitioners' prayer for pre-arrest bail in an investigation under sections 302/120-B IPC, holding that the serious nature of the allegation warranted refusal despite the petitioners' claim of late naming in the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for pre-arrest bail is rejected.

Madhav Sah and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42373 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -159 Year- 2007 Thana -LAUKHI District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== 1. Madhav Sah Son of Late Banwali Sah, Resident of Village- Murli, P.S. Phulparas, District- Madhubani. 2. Suffi Devi @ Sutti Devi, Wife of Madhav Sah, Resident of VillageMurli, P.S. Phulparas, District- Madhubani. 3. Phulo Devi @ Fulo Devi wife of Bindeshwar Sah, resident of Kachanarwa, P.S. Laukahi, District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.A.Khan(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶3

2 09-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

¶4

The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Laukahi P.S. Case No.159 of 2007 dated 06.11.2007 registered under sections 302/120-B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

It is contended that the petitioners are not named in the FIR and in course of investigation their names transpired after several years of occurrence.

¶6

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for pre-arrest bail. Referring to the impugned order dated 31.07.2015 passed by the learned Sessions Judge,

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42373 of 2015 (2) dt.09-10-2015

¶8

2/2

¶9

Madhubani, it is submitted that in paragraphs 81, 82, 99, 149 and 180 of the case diary names of the petitioners have been disclosed by the witnesses during investigation.

¶10

Be that as it may, regard being had to the serious nature of allegation, I am not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, their prayer for pre-arrest bail is rejected.

¶11

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)

¶12

Pradeep/-

¶13

U T

Madhav Sah and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhav Sah and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kumar Singh and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Raushan Bhagat @ Raushan Kumar Bhagat and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranju Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Neeraj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Raju and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Vikash Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.