Partly allowed

Md. Muntaseer and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC10 Apr 2015CR. MISC./41561/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court rejected anticipatory bail prayers for two petitioners due to the nature of allegations and injury, directing them to surrender for regular bail. It granted anticipatory bail to the other two petitioners on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties upon their arrest or surrender within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Rejected bail for Petitioners 1 and 2. Granted anticipatory bail for Petitioners 3 and 4 on bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with sureties within four weeks.

Md. Muntaseer and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No41561 of 2014

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -187 Year- 2014 Thana -DARBHANGA SADAR DistrictDARBHANGA ====================================================== 1. Md. Muntaseer Son of Md. Barique 2. Md. Mumtaz Son of Md. Barique 3. Md. Barique Son of Late Md. Rasul 4. Md. Mubarak Son of Late Md. Rasul All are resident of Village - Chhapaki-pari, P.S. - Sadar, District - Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶3

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Barun Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kr.Singh 1(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH

¶4

ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 10-04-2015 The four petitioners have moved this Court seeking bail in anticipation of arrest in Darbhanga Police Station (PS) Case No 187 of 2014 instituted under Sections 147, 341, 447, 323, 324, 554 and 504 of Indian Penal Code.

¶6

Considering the nature of allegations and the nature of injury, prayer for bail in respect of petitioner No 1 Md Muntaseer and petitioner No 2 Md Mumtaz is rejected with an observation that they may surrender before the Court below and pray for regular bail which would be dealt with on its own merit without being prejudiced by order of this Court.

¶7

So far as petitioner No 3 Md Barique and petitioner No

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41561 of 2014 (2) dt.10-04-2015

¶9

¶10

4 Md Mubarak are concerned, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, they shall be released on bail on each of them furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in Darbhanga PS Case No 187 of 2014 dated 26.05.2014 subject to all conditions as laid down in Section 438 (2) of Criminal Procedure Code.

¶11

(Navaniti Prasad Singh, J)

¶12

M.E.H. /-

¶13

U T

Md. Muntaseer and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Muntaseer and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Anand Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mithila Minority Dental College And Hospital Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Subedar Singh Vs State of Bihar and Ors.

Nawal Kishore Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Arun Kumar Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Swaroop Singh Vs The State Of Bihar