Court rejected the petitioner's application to renew the prayer for pre-arrest bail in a cheque dishonor case, finding no good ground for reconsideration after hearing counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40205 of 2015
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -464 Year- 2013 Thana -RUNISAIDPUR District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Ram Sewak Mehta @ Ram Sewak Mahto @ Ram Sewak Mahtha son of Late Mahabir Mehta. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinesh Maharaj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. R.P.S.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 3 14-10-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P. The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for pre-arrest bail which was earlier rejected by order dated 01.04.2015 vide Cr. Misc. No. 38896 of 2014 on the ground that this case has been lodged under pressure and collusion with Ajoy Srivastava against whom the petitioner complained to the Head Office of Central Bank of India. Without proper authorization the F.I.R. has been lodged in 2013 against the petitioner who was the then Branch Manager of the same Branch in the year 2008. In F.I.R. it is not disclosed as to when inspection was done by Sri Sarbeshwar Prasad Singh and whether he was authorized to inspect by the Zonal Office, Regional Office or Head Office. During investigation the Investigating Officer has called for some
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40205 of 2015 (3) dt.14-10-2015
2/2
documents but the same have not been supplied up till now. In investigation nothing has come and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration.
The learned A.P.P. opposes prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions and going through the case diary and noticing no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioner, again prayer for prearrest bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with Runisaidpur P.S. Case No. 464 of 2013 pending in the court of C.J.M. Sitamarhi.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J)
Abhay/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for pre-arrest bail deserves reconsideration.
Ram Sewak Mehta
The State of Bihar
Jitendra Mohan Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
