Allowed

Babu Saheb Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC14 Jan 2015CR. MISC./39490/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court, through Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra, granted bail to the petitioner, Babu Saheb Mahto, who was an accused in a complaint case under Sections 328, 307, and 379 IPC, directing him to furnish a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each, one being a parent or close relative.

Babu Saheb Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39490 of 2014 (4) dt.14-01-2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39490 of 2014

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -4 Year- 2014 Thana -KHAGARIA GRP CASE District- KHAGARIA

¶4

====================================================== BABU SAHEB MAHTO, S/O SRI GANESH MAHTO, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - BAKHARI GARHI TOLA, P.S. - BAKHARI, DISTRICT - BEGUSARAI. .... .... PETITIONER/S VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR .... .... OPPOSITE PARTY/S ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar No-1, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arvind Kr.Pandey (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶5

4 14-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶6

The petitioner is accused in connection with Special Case No. 281 of 2014 arising out of Khagaria Rail P.S. Case No. 04 of 2014 registered under Sections 328, 307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that regarding administering intoxicated Biscuit to the informant and snatching of his mobile, articles and cash, Khagaria P.S. Case No. 04 of 2014 was registered against unknown. Later on, the snatched mobile was recovered from one Rahul Kumar, who disclosed that the said mobile was soled by the petitioner to him, except that there is

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39490 of 2014 (4) dt.14-01-2015

¶9

nothing against the petitioner. It is further submitted that although the petitioner is in custody since 07.04.2014 but he has not been put on T.I. Parade while the informant has claimed to identify the

¶10

culprits on seeing him in his restatement before the police.

¶11

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Khagaria, in connection with Special Case No. 281 of 2014 arising out of Khagaria Rail P.S. Case No. 04 of 2014. Out of two sureties one surety must be the parents or close relative of the petitioner.

¶12

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)

¶13

Bhardwaj/-

¶14

U T

Babu Saheb Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Babu Saheb Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Sultan Hussain Idrishi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Manirudin Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Rajhib Azam Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Dipu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Bittu Pandey @ Bittu Kumar Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar

Vinay Kumar @ Vinay Kumar Rai Vs The State Of Bihar