Sangita Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment is an oral order dismissing the case due to non-prosecution as the petitioners failed to appear despite repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37017 of 2012 (6) dt.01-04-2015
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37017 of 2012 ====================================================== |
|---|
1. Sangita Singh W/O Late Sanjay Singh R/O Village - Padumker, P.S. Patahi, District - East Champaran, Motihari 2. Saurav Kumar Singh @ Tinku Singh S/O Bijay Singh R/O Village - Padumker, P.S. Patahi, District - East Champaran, Motihari .... .... Petitioners. Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== |
Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Binay Kant Mani Tripathi, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Satyavrat Verma, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER |
| 6 01-04-2015 On repeated calls, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners. |
| Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 as well as learned counsel for the State is present. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for non-prosecution. |
U |
m.p. T |
(Gopal Prasad, J) |
|---|
Sangita Singh
Saurav Kumar Singh
The State Of Bihar
GOPAL PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court